Agentic loop
A system where a model does not just answer once, but acts, observes the result and decides what to do next. Useful for experimentation — but only as reliable as the observation step.
Automation has its own dialect, and most of it is borrowed from other fields with the meaning quietly changed. This is how we use these words, written so that a domain expert from outside machine learning can follow the engineering, and an engineer can follow the science.
Where a term has a precise meaning inside a specific domain, treat the definition here as our working usage rather than a universal one.
A system where a model does not just answer once, but acts, observes the result and decides what to do next. Useful for experimentation — but only as reliable as the observation step.
An AI system owning the full cycle: proposing hypotheses, running experiments, evaluating results and choosing the next round. What AutoScientia builds.
See the loopThe reference a result is measured against. It is frozen for the duration of a comparison, because a win that comes from moving the measuring stick is not a win.
The hard ceiling on compute or spend attached to an objective. Enforced by the scheduler before a trial starts, not audited after the invoice arrives.
See control surfacesA single proposed experiment: one configuration, design or hypothesis that the loop is considering running.
Search where each round of results changes what is proposed next, rather than walking a fixed grid of experiments. The opposite is open-loop or grid search.
What an improvement actually cost in compute and time to obtain. The number that stops a loop from mistaking activity for progress.
The automated scoring machinery that decides whether a run produced anything worth keeping. In an autonomous lab this is the product.
See measurementEverything between “here is a candidate” and “here is a result”: queueing, placement, resources, retries, checkpoints and result collection.
A state-of-the-art model used as the proposer in our loop. It generates ideas and plans; it does not decide what counts as success.
A large, well-defined societal problem — clean water, clean energy, security, health — where progress is measurable but slow under manual experimentation.
See applicationsA metric the proposer never sees, used to check whether an apparent gain generalises or was simply fitted to the visible measurement.
People making the decisions that should not be automated: objectives, budgets, stopping conditions and any effect outside the sandbox.
One turn of the cycle. Iteration time — not effort — is the quantity the whole system exists to reduce.
The study of how research itself is done. In our context: how to tell that an automated system is doing science rather than generating plausible activity.
See research themesHow much damage could follow if a capability were pointed at a hostile objective. Screened before a campaign is approved, not after.
What the loop is asked to optimise, stated before any experiment runs and together with what would count as failure.
When a system optimises the metric you wrote instead of the outcome you meant. Most automation failures are this, wearing a different hat.
Running many trials at once rather than one after another. Real parallelism needs scheduling, isolation and per-trial budgets, not just more machines.
Moving a candidate from one round to the next, with the evidence that justified it. The moment where a loop is most tempted to cheat itself.
The component that turns an objective and past results into the next set of candidates, ranked by expected value and cost.
Being able to re-run a result from its record: code, data references, configuration and environment. At machine scale this becomes a systems problem rather than a habit.
The versioned description of an experiment, complete enough to rebuild and re-score it. If it is missing, the number is not reported.
See measurementHow much useful information a search extracts per experiment. The difference between a loop that finds an answer and one that runs out of budget looking.
Isolated execution with no ambient credentials and restricted network access, where machine-generated code is allowed to run and fail safely.
See securityWhat may vary in an experiment, what is fixed, and which interactions are worth spending trials on. Declared before the cycle starts.
Hypothesis, experiment, observation, revision. Our claim is narrow and deliberate: we automate the loop, not the reasoning about what matters.
Finished, scored experiments per unit of time at a fixed cost. The single number that best describes whether an automated lab is actually working.
A single execution of one candidate under a pinned configuration. Thousands of trials make a cycle; a cycle makes a campaign.
Tell us and we will fix the definition. Precise language is part of the work, not decoration.